1,683
25
Essay, 3 pages (650 words)

Homicide and criminal justice

Advertising We'll write a high-quality original custom paper on Homicide and criminal justice just for you with a 15% discount for the 1st order Use a Discount Use a Discount

Homicide and Criminal Justice
In the American criminal justice system, homicide is allegedly the worst form of offensive acts that courts handle (Gilbert, 2004). Although most people confuse it with murder, homicide is a broader term that includes criminal and non-criminal killing of human beings (Gilbert, 2004). This paper discusses homicide in relation to the US criminal justice system. The paper analyses different forms of homicide and the circumstances under which a suspect can be declared guilty for death of another person.
There are two forms of homicide that do not amount to criminal acts – excusable and justifiable homicides (Fox & Jack, 2001). As noted by Fox and Jack (2001), homicide is considered excusable if death results from a mistake that cannot be described as sufficient to declare someone guilty. An example of excusable homicide is a road accident that leads to death but does not result from driver’s serious negligence. Justifiable homicide is acceptable killing of a person (Fox & Jack, 2001). For example, a person can kill another person in self-defence or soldiers can shoot and kill members of enemy camps without committing criminal offences. Acceptable killing is also called non-felonious homicide (Fox & Jack, 2001).
On the other hand, felonious homicides – also known as criminal homicides – comprise of two broad forms of illegal killing (Fox & Jack, 2001). In this regard, as pointed out by Fox and Jack, felonious homicide that is not premeditated is called manslaughter in most US states. The worst form of homicide called murder is a criminal act in which a person’s meditation to kill leads to actual killing of another person (Fox & Jack, 2001). In some states, criminal homicide is classified in terms of degrees depending on circumstances under which killing takes place.
A person can bear murder related responsibilities in two ways (Arafa, 2008). First, an individual can only bear criminal liability for murder if he or she intended to kill and actually killed another person. However, according to Arafa (2008), sometimes people can bear criminal responsibilities for crimes they did not commit. In this regard, a person who assists or encourages commission of murder bears accomplice responsibility. A person can only be an accomplice in murder case if he or she wanted the killed person to die and would bear responsibility for any other crime committed as a result of commission of the original crime (Arafa, 2008).
In criminal justice, there are three elements used to decide whether a person is criminally responsible for murder or not. The first element – mens rea – provides that a suspect can only be guilty for murder if he or she intended to kill (Yeo, 2002). This element exonerates people who unwillingly cause death to others. Actus reus is another element which provides that people can only bear criminal liability for offences they actually committed (Yeo, 2002). This element exonerates an individual who wishes to kill another person but does not do it. A combination of these two elements leads to a third element called concurrence which provides that a person can only be criminally responsible for murder if his or her intention to kill leads to actual killing of a person (Yeo, 2002).
In conclusion, homicide is a serious case that requires proper assessment to deliver justice to victims without compromising the rights of accused persons. Right crime elements should be applied during determination to ensure fairness to both sides of case proceedings.
References
Arafa. M. A. (2008). Criminal complicity – accomplice criminal liability to the criminal offences ‘a comparative analysis between the Egyptian criminal law system and the criminal law system of the United States of America’. Alexandria: Alexandria University.
Fox, J. F. & Jack L. (2001). The will to kill. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gilbert, J. N. (2004). Criminal investigation. New York: Prentice Hall, 2004.
Yeo, S. (2002). Causation, fault and the concurrence Principle. Otago Law Review. 10(2): 214-224.

Thanks for Voting!
Homicide and criminal justice. Page 1
Homicide and criminal justice. Page 2
Homicide and criminal justice. Page 3
Homicide and criminal justice. Page 4

The paper "Homicide and criminal justice" was written by a real student and voluntarily submitted to this database. You can use this work as a sample in order to gain inspiration or start the research for your own writing. You aren't allowed to use any part of this example without properly citing it first.

If you are the author of this paper and don't want it to be used on EduPony, contact us for its removal.

Ask for Removal

Cite this Essay

References

EduPony. (2022) 'Homicide and criminal justice'. 26 January.

Reference

EduPony. (2022, January 26). Homicide and criminal justice. Retrieved from https://edupony.com/homicide-and-criminal-justice/

References

EduPony. 2022. "Homicide and criminal justice." January 26, 2022. https://edupony.com/homicide-and-criminal-justice/.

1. EduPony. "Homicide and criminal justice." January 26, 2022. https://edupony.com/homicide-and-criminal-justice/.


Bibliography


EduPony. "Homicide and criminal justice." January 26, 2022. https://edupony.com/homicide-and-criminal-justice/.

Work Cited

"Homicide and criminal justice." EduPony, 26 Jan. 2022, edupony.com/homicide-and-criminal-justice/.

Contact EduPony

If you have any suggestions on how to improve Homicide and criminal justice, please do not hesitate to contact us. We want to know more: [email protected]