1,562
14
Essay, 2 pages (400 words)

Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987)

Advertising We'll write a high-quality original custom paper on Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987) just for you with a 15% discount for the 1st order Use a Discount Use a Discount

Grusendorf v Oklahoma 816 F. 2d 539 (U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 1987) Affiliation Issue Greg Grusendorf took three puffs from a cigarette while on a lunch break from his job as a firefighter trainee with the Oklahoma City Fire Department on December 14, 1984. He was then fired as a result of his misdeeds by the supervisor. He took the matter to the court claiming his rights were violated.  The Court has recognized a right of liberty or privacy in only a handful of circumstances. It can hardly be disputed that the Oklahoma City Fire Departments non-smoking regulation invades upon the liberty and privacy of the firefighter trainees (Ducat, 2009).
Rule
The Supreme Court observed that only personal rights that can be deemed important in the concept of ordered liberty are included in this guarantee of personal liberty( Ducat, 2009). The Court outlined the current reach of these freedoms as embracing personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing and education. The defendant argues out that the law used to judge him was not applicable and did not match with his case (The federal reporter, 1987).
Application
To resolve the issue of whether or not Grusendorf’s rights of liberty or privacy were violated by the non-smoking regulation, it is instructive to study the Supreme Courts approach in Kelley v. Johnson. The case is similar as this one though the plaintiff there was a police officer rather than a firefighter and claimed a fourteenth amendment right to grow a beard rather than a right to smoke a cigarette (Bureau of National Affairs , 1995).
Conclusion
A review of the record suggests that the district court found the defendants disputes influential. The defendants moved for an award of attorneys fees and submitted briefs in support of it, together with affidavits from their attorneys detailing their fees. Bowers v. Hardwick said that the federal courts should not take an expansive view of their authority to discover new fundamental rights.
Works Cited
Ducat, C. (2009). Constitutional Interpretation. New York: Cengage Learning.
Bureau of National Affairs . (1995). Labor relations reporter: Analysis/News and background information, Volumes 148-150. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs.
Ducat, C. (2009). Constitutional Interpretation: Rights of the Individual, Volume 2. New York: Cengage Learning.
The federal reporter. (1987). The federal reporter, Volume 816. California: University of California.

Thanks for Voting!
Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987). Page 1
Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987). Page 2
Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987). Page 3

The paper "Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987)" was written by a real student and voluntarily submitted to this database. You can use this work as a sample in order to gain inspiration or start the research for your own writing. You aren't allowed to use any part of this example without properly citing it first.

If you are the author of this paper and don't want it to be used on EduPony, contact us for its removal.

Ask for Removal

Cite this Essay

References

EduPony. (2022) 'Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987)'. 25 January.

Reference

EduPony. (2022, January 25). Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987). Retrieved from https://edupony.com/grusendorf-v-oklahoma-city-816-f-2d-539-us-court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-1987/

References

EduPony. 2022. "Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987)." January 25, 2022. https://edupony.com/grusendorf-v-oklahoma-city-816-f-2d-539-us-court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-1987/.

1. EduPony. "Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987)." January 25, 2022. https://edupony.com/grusendorf-v-oklahoma-city-816-f-2d-539-us-court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-1987/.


Bibliography


EduPony. "Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987)." January 25, 2022. https://edupony.com/grusendorf-v-oklahoma-city-816-f-2d-539-us-court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-1987/.

Work Cited

"Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987)." EduPony, 25 Jan. 2022, edupony.com/grusendorf-v-oklahoma-city-816-f-2d-539-us-court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-1987/.

Contact EduPony

If you have any suggestions on how to improve Grusendorf v oklahoma city, 816 f. 2d 539 (u.s. court of appeals for the tenth circuit 1987), please do not hesitate to contact us. We want to know more: [email protected]